Prediction of Sue Barker vs Elizabeth Minter Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Barker vs E. Minter

Sue Barker

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Elizabeth Minter

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Barker 1 - 0 Minter

They have played 3 sets in total, with Sue Barker winning 2 and Elizabeth Minter winning 1. The last match between Sue Barker and Elizabeth Minter was at the Kansas City, 19-09-1983, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Sue Barker getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Barker	1
Minter	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Kansas City(09-19-83)

Stats

Sue Barker

Elizabeth Minter

S. Barker vs E. Minter H2H Profile

S. Barker	Stats	E. Minter
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
62.33% (417-252)	Career Total W/L	51.49% (121-114)
1	Hard	0
4	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Barker vs E. Minter Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sue Barker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Elizabeth Minter has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sue Barker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Elizabeth Minter has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sue Barker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elizabeth Minter has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sue Barker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Elizabeth Minter winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sue Barker has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 115/47), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 43/37). Elizabeth Minter has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 14/12), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 47% (W/L 28/31).
Player level: In the last year, Sue Barker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Elizabeth Minter has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sue Barker winning 1 times and Elizabeth Minter being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sue Barker winning 2 and Elizabeth Minter winning 1.
The last match between Sue Barker and Elizabeth Minter was at the Kansas City, 19-09-1983, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Sue Barker getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sue Barker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Elizabeth Minter has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sue Barker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elizabeth Minter has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sue Barker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elizabeth Minter has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sue Barker vs Elizabeth Minter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Barker vs E. Minter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Barker	Stats	E. Minter
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Barker Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 26-11-1984
Q1 Kim SteinmetzK. Steinmetz	L	7-6(4) 6-2	Stats
Sydney - 19-11-1984
R2 Rosalyn FairbankR. Fairbank	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Brighton - 23-10-1984
R3 Virginia RuziciV. Ruzici	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 28-08-1984
R1 Katerina BohmovaK. Bohmova	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Montreal - 20-08-1984
R2 Carina KarlssonC. Karlsson	L	6-3 RET	Stats

View All

E. Minter Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 15-01-1990
Q1 Magdalena MaleevaM. Maleeva	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 26-06-1989
Q1 Rita WinebargerR. Winebarger	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Q2 Jill SmollerJ. Smoller	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Eastbourne - 19-06-1989
Q2 Janine TremellingJ. Tremelling	L	2-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Q1 Akemi NishiyaA. Nishiya	W	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

S. Barker vs E. Minter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Barker	Stats	E. Minter
62.33% (417/252)	YTD Win/Loss	51.49% (121/114)
60.16% (888/588)	Sets Win/Loss	51.59% (276/259)
54.04% (7264/6178)	Games Win/Loss	50.45% (2475/2431)
53.75% (43/37)	Hard Win/Loss	51.35% (38/36)
58.67% (44/31)	Clay Win/Loss	53.85% (14/12)
56.88% (124/94)	Indoor Hard W/L	58.82% (10/7)
70.99% (115/47)	Grass Win/Loss	52.54% (31/28)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
141.03	Average Opponent Rank	338.83
64.71% (11/6)	Slam W/L	33.33% (1/2)
48.78% (20/21)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	71.88% (23/9)
65.74% (71/37)	Futures W/L	39.53% (17/26)
63% (404/646)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (119/231)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
61% (11/18)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	40% (2/5)
57% (96/169)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (35/71)
90% (393/353)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (119/103)
10% (393/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (119/16)
21% (266/56)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (114/18)